Volume 6, Issue 3, May 2018, Page: 67-70
Long-Term Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Laparoscopic Butterfly Suspension
Shunshuang Li, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Mei Ji, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Xianlan Zhao, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Xiaoyan Zhang, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Received: May 21, 2018;       Accepted: Jun. 4, 2018;       Published: Jun. 28, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15      View  641      Downloads  31
Abstract
Aim The study aimed to investigate the long clinic value of laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension for pelvic organ prolapse. Methods Ninety-three patients who underwent the laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension from December 2012 to May 2018 at the first affiliated hospital of zhengzhou university were analyzed in a retrospective study. Baseline characteristics and perioperative data were recorded. The POP quantification (POP-Q) system indicates the pre- and post-operative data. Respectively,the symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and Sexual function were evaluated by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and the Pelvic organ prolapse urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Results In 5 years’ follow-up, the objective cure ratio reached 97.8%, and the subjective success rate of the laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension was 93.5%. Two cases was identified as clinical relapse. There was only one abdominal erosion during the long-term follow-up. The quality of life had improved significantly without any genital symptoms. No patients abstained from sex due to the operation or postoperative sexual discomfort. Conclusions The laparoscopic colpo-uterine butterfly suspension is a safe, feasible and highly effective technique that offers a good long-term results for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, also a good option for sexually active women.
Keywords
Colpo-uterine Suspension, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Laparoscopic, Erosion, Sexually Active
To cite this article
Shunshuang Li, Mei Ji, Xianlan Zhao, Xiaoyan Zhang, Long-Term Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Laparoscopic Butterfly Suspension, Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Vol. 6, No. 3, 2018, pp. 67-70. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20180603.15
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Rortveit G, Brown JS, Thom DH, et al. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence and risk factors in a population-based, racially diverse cohort. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 1396-1403.
[2]
Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG 2013; 120: 152-60.
[3]
Digesu G, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, et al. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG 2005: 112: 971-976.
[4]
Chan SS, Cheung RY, Yiu KW, et al. Symptoms, quality of life, and factors affecting women's treatment decisions regarding pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2012; 23: 1027-33.
[5]
Haya N, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, et al. Prolapse and continence surgery in countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2012. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 755 e751-27.
[6]
Cheon C, Maher C. Economics of pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24: 1873-6.
[7]
Withagen, M. I., Milani, A. L., den Boon, J. Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117, 242-50.
[8]
Sivaslioglu, A. A., Unlubilgin, E., Dolen, I. A randomized comparison of polypropylene mesh surgery with site-specific surgery in the treatment of cystocoele. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008; 19, 467-71.
[9]
Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. AmJ Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 10-7.
[10]
Chan SS, Cheung RY, Yiu AK, et al. Chinese validation of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ). Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22: 1305-12.
[11]
Zhu L, Yu S, Xu T, Yang X, Lu Y, Lang J. Validation of the Chinese version of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire short form (PISQ-12). Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012; 116 (2): 117-9.
[12]
Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 372-377.
[13]
Shunshuang Li, Mei Ji, Zhao Zhao. The effectiveness of two different laparoscopic surgeries for apical support of pelvic organ prolapse. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2015; 188: 74-78.
[14]
Maher CF, Feiner B, DeCuyper EM, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204: 360. e1-360.e7.
[15]
Withagen MI, Milani AL, den Boon J, et al. Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 242-250.
[16]
de Landsheere, L. Changes in elastin density in different locations of the vaginal wall in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2014; 25, 1673-1681.
[17]
Vollebregt, A., Fischer, K., Gietelink, D. et al. Primary surgical repair of anterior vaginal prolapse: a randomised trial comparing anatomical and functional outcome between anterior colporrhaphy and trocar-guided transobturator anterior mesh. BJOG 2011; 118, 1518-27.
[18]
Nieminen, K, Hiltunen R, Takala T, et al. Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: a randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203, e1-8.
[19]
F. CECI, E. SPAZIANI, S. CORELLI, et al. Technique and outcomes about a new laparoscopic procedure: the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Suspension (POPS). G Chir 2013; 34: 141-144.
[20]
Bousserghine Y, Droupy S, Wagner L, et al. Denovo stress urinary incontinence following sacral colpopexy. Prog Urol 2011; 21: 631-5.
[21]
Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, et al. Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 367-373.
Browse journals by subject